JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 20, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Eleonora Serna Rey Como Apoderada De Elkin Jose Gil Correa

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de sentencia de reemplazo.

El memorialista solicita a la Sala de Revisión que emita una sentencia que reemplace la decisión adoptada por el juzgado 24 Administrativo de Bogotá, dentro de la acción de nulidad y restablecimiento de derecho que dio origen a la acción constitucional, argumentando que en esta decisión se desconoció el precedente constitucional, con lo que se incumplió la orden impartida por la Corporación en el fallo T-641/11.

Se DENIEGA la solicitud impetrada por el peticionario y se da traslado de su escrito a la Procuraduría General de la Nación.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud para que se profiera una sentencia de reemplazo de la sentencia dictada por el Juez de Instancia 24 Administrativo del Circuito de Bogotá.
  2. Segundo. ENTREGAR COPIA de la presente providencia al ciudadano Elkin José Gil Correa y a su apoderada la señora Eleonora Serna Rey y DAR TRASLADO de su escrito a la Procuraduría General de la Nación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.